
| 1 | Inter MiamiUSA | 80 | 63.5 | +16.5 |
| 2 | Vancouver WhitecapsCanada | 74 | 68.1 | +5.9 |
| 13 | San DiegoUSA | 57 | 52.2 | +4.8 |
| 1 | Inter MiamiUSA | 55 | 44.8 | +10.2 |
| 2 | Vancouver WhitecapsCanada | 50 | 53.3 | -3.3 |
| 14 | San DiegoUSA | 38 | 39.8 | -1.8 |
| 1 | Vancouver WhitecapsCanada | 6.0 | 205 |
| 2 | Inter MiamiUSA | 5.8 | 197 |
| 19 | San DiegoUSA | 4.5 | 153 |
| 1 | Vancouver WhitecapsCanada | 16.5 | 562 |
| 2 | Los Angeles FCUSA | 14.5 | 494 |
| 6 | San DiegoUSA | 12.4 | 422 |
| 1 | New York Red BullsUSA | 7.9 | 268 |
| 2 | Sporting Kansas CityUSA | 7.2 | 246 |
| 26 | San DiegoUSA | 4.9 | 167 |
| 1 | Vancouver WhitecapsCanada | 18.5 | 628 |
| 2 | DC UnitedUSA | 18.0 | 611 |
| 21 | San DiegoUSA | 14.2 | 484 |
| 1 | Philadelphia UnionUSA | 12.8 | 435 |
| 2 | Toronto FCCanada | 10.9 | 370 |
| 22 | San DiegoUSA | 8.6 | 291 |
| 1 | Philadelphia UnionUSA | 35.9 | 1219 |
| 2 | DC UnitedUSA | 35.7 | 1213 |
| 13 | San DiegoUSA | 31.0 | 1054 |
| 1 | Houston DynamoUSA | 4.3 | 145 |
| 2 | Portland TimbersUSA | 4.2 | 143 |
| 11 | San DiegoUSA | 3.7 | 125 |
| 1 | Los Angeles GalaxyUSA | 8 |
| 1 | Minnesota United FCUSA | 8 |
| 18 | San DiegoUSA | 3 |
| 1 | Nashville SCUSA | 17 | 34 |
| 2 | Houston DynamoUSA | 13 | 34 |
| 6 | San DiegoUSA | 8 | 34 |
| 1 | Sporting Kansas CityUSA | 81 | 60.3 | +20.7 |
| 2 | Orlando City SCUSA | 78 | 65.8 | +12.2 |
| 7 | San DiegoUSA | 63 | 53.0 | +10.0 |
| 1 | Philadelphia UnionUSA | 15.2 | 517 |
| 2 | Colorado RapidsUSA | 14.6 | 495 |
| 21 | San DiegoUSA | 10.7 | 363 |
| 1 | Colorado RapidsUSA | 14.0 | 476 |
| 2 | San DiegoUSA | 13.8 | 468 |
| 3 | Portland TimbersUSA | 13.1 | 447 |
| 1 | Colorado RapidsUSA | 2.6 | 87 |
| 2 | Inter MiamiUSA | 2.5 | 86 |
| 13 | San DiegoUSA | 1.9 | 64 |
| 1 | San DiegoUSA | 8 |
| 2 | Colorado RapidsUSA | 7 |
| 2 | Houston DynamoUSA | 7 |
Goals, assists, shots, defending, fouls, cards, and competition context.
Last updated:
San Diego team stats in MLS 2026 compare the side against the competition field across goals, assists, shots, defending, fouls, and cards. The comparison includes 30 teams across 16 ranking views. San Diego's main numbers include goals: 57, assists: 38, shots: 12.4 per game, and clean sheets: 8.
San Diego's stat profile includes goals: 57, assists: 38, shots: 12.4 per game, and clean sheets: 8. Those core numbers give a quick read on attacking output, chance volume, and defensive returns before moving into the individual ranking categories.
The attacking team rankings highlight Goals: Inter Miami (80), Assists: Inter Miami (55), Shots on target: Vancouver Whitecaps (6.0 per game), and Shots: Vancouver Whitecaps (16.5 per game). Inter Miami (80) leads the scoring table. These numbers compare goals, assists, shots on target, and overall shooting volume across the competition.
Defensive and goalkeeping team rankings include Clean sheets: Nashville SC (17), Goals conceded: Sporting Kansas City (81), Successful tackles: Vancouver Whitecaps (18.5 per game), Interceptions: Philadelphia Union (12.8 per game), and Clearances: Philadelphia Union (35.9 per game). That adds context for clean sheets, goals conceded, tackles, interceptions, clearances, and blocks alongside the attacking tables.
Discipline team rankings include Fouls committed: Philadelphia Union (15.2 per game), Fouls won: Colorado Rapids (14.0 per game), Yellow cards: Colorado Rapids (2.6 per game), and Red cards: San Diego (8), showing where fouls, cards, and physical match control sit in the wider team-stat picture.