
| 1 | ChelseaEngland | 45 | 33.1 | +11.9 |
| 2 | Legia WarszawaPoland | 37 | 29.8 | +7.2 |
| 127 | GAP Connah S Quay FCWales | 1 | 1.3 | -0.3 |
| 1 | ChelseaEngland | 32 | 23.2 | +8.8 |
| 2 | FiorentinaItaly | 22 | 21.1 | +0.9 |
| 3 | FC ST. GallenSwitzerland | 19 | 16.3 | +2.7 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 36.5 | 73 |
| 2 | FK PartizanSerbia | 21.5 | 43 |
| 3 | TromsøNorway | 20.8 | 83 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 65.5 | 131 |
| 2 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 38.8 | 155 |
| 3 | TromsøNorway | 37.0 | 148 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 48.5 | 97 |
| 2 | Universitatea CraiovaRomania | 38.5 | 77 |
| 3 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 32.5 | 130 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 113.0 | 226 |
| 2 | HNK RijekaCroatia | 72.5 | 145 |
| 3 | TromsøNorway | 63.5 | 254 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 66.0 | 132 |
| 2 | TromsøNorway | 42.0 | 168 |
| 3 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 39.3 | 157 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 198.5 | 397 |
| 2 | TromsøNorway | 132.8 | 531 |
| 3 | HNK RijekaCroatia | 130.5 | 261 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 18.0 | 36 |
| 2 | ST MirrenScotland | 11.3 | 45 |
| 3 | TromsøNorway | 11.0 | 44 |
| 1 | Legia WarszawaPoland | 9 | 16 |
| 1 | Olimpija LjubljanaSlovenia | 9 | 14 |
| 55 | GAP Connah S Quay FCWales | 1 | 2 |
| 1 | CeljeSlovenia | 26 | 19.4 | +6.6 |
| 2 | FC ST. GallenSwitzerland | 23 | 24.3 | -1.3 |
| 144 | GAP Connah S Quay FCWales | 2 | - | - |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 70.5 | 141 |
| 2 | HNK RijekaCroatia | 58.0 | 116 |
| 3 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 48.8 | 195 |
| 1 | SilkeborgDenmark | 80.0 | 160 |
| 2 | HNK RijekaCroatia | 50.0 | 100 |
| 3 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 41.8 | 167 |
| 1 | AEK Athens FCGreece | 9.8 | 39 |
| 2 | FK PartizanSerbia | 9.5 | 19 |
| 27 | GAP Connah S Quay FCWales | 3.5 | 7 |
Goals, assists, shots, defending, fouls, cards, and competition context.
Last updated:
GAP Connah S Quay FC team stats in UEFA Conference League 2024/25 compare the side against the competition field across goals, assists, shots, defending, fouls, and cards. The comparison includes 164 teams across 17 ranking views. GAP Connah S Quay FC's main numbers include goals: 1, assists: 0, shots: 0.0 per game, and clean sheets: 1.
GAP Connah S Quay FC's stat profile includes goals: 1, assists: 0, shots: 0.0 per game, and clean sheets: 1. Those core numbers give a quick read on attacking output, chance volume, and defensive returns before moving into the individual ranking categories.
The attacking team rankings highlight Goals: Chelsea (45), Assists: Chelsea (32), Shots on target: Silkeborg (36.5 per game), and Shots: Silkeborg (65.5 per game). Chelsea (45) leads the scoring table. These numbers compare goals, assists, shots on target, and overall shooting volume across the competition.
Defensive and goalkeeping team rankings include Clean sheets: Legia Warszawa (9), Goals conceded: Celje (26), Successful tackles: Silkeborg (113.0 per game), Interceptions: Silkeborg (66.0 per game), and Clearances: Silkeborg (198.5 per game). That adds context for clean sheets, goals conceded, tackles, interceptions, clearances, and blocks alongside the attacking tables.
Discipline team rankings include Fouls committed: Silkeborg (70.5 per game), Fouls won: Silkeborg (80.0 per game), Yellow cards: AEK Athens FC (9.8 per game), and Red cards: Larne (5), showing where fouls, cards, and physical match control sit in the wider team-stat picture.